Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts

Monday, January 14, 2008

Mikki & Yo Track Ancestral Origin


Official Press Release from the PBS Pressroom:

In honor of Black History Month and in conjunction with the PBS series African American Lives 2, Sacramento Kings center Mikki Moore and Sacramento Monarchs forward / center Yolanda Griffith participated in maternal DNA testing today at the Kings/ Monarchs Practice Facility. Tune into KVIE (PBS) beginning February 6 for
African American Lives 2. Also be on the lookout for the feature story running in the Sacramento Bee in February.

The Genetic Genealogy test is done to help people trace their ancestral origins. The test sample was collected by each player scraping the inside of their mouth to collect buccal (cheek) cells.

Because DNA studies have shown people share a common ancestor with those who lived in Africa 50,000 to 200,000 years ago, both players thought it would be a great opportunity to learn more about their ancestral past.

-------------------------

AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES 2
Wednesdays, February 6-13, 2008
9:00-11:00 p.m. ET
– Four-Part Series Explores Roots, Race and Identity Through Ancestry of Remarkable Individuals, Including Maya Angelou, Bliss Broyard, Don Cheadle, Morgan Freeman, Peter Gomes, Kathleen Henderson, Linda Johnson Rice, Tom Joyner, Jackie Joyner-Kersee, Chris Rock and Tina Turner –

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“These stories of adversity, sacrifice, achievement and
empowerment transcend the realm of color with a universal resonance.”
– Henry Louis Gates Jr., series host and participant
Building on the widespread acclaim of AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES (2006) and OPRAH’S ROOTS (2007), AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES 2 will again journey deep into the African-American experience to reveal the triumphs and tragedies within the family histories of an all-new group of remarkable participants. Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. returns as series host, guiding genealogical investigations down through the 20th century, Reconstruction, slavery and early U.S. history, and presenting cutting-edge genetic analysis that locates participants’ ancestors in Africa, Europe and America. AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES 2 airs Wednesdays, February 6-13, 2008, 9:00-11:00 p.m. ET on PBS.

“These discoveries about our ancestors are fascinating stories that everyone, regardless of race, can identify with and draw inspiration from,” said Gates, Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and director of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University. “They’re stories that together offer a new understanding of not only the African-American experience, but also of race in America.”

Joining Professor Gates in the new broadcast are poet Maya Angelou, author Bliss Broyard, actor Don Cheadle, actor Morgan Freeman, theologian Peter Gomes, publisher Linda Johnson Rice, athlete Jackie Joyner-Kersee, radio personality Tom Joyner, comedian Chris Rock, rock ’n’ roll legend Tina Turner and college administrator Kathleen Henderson, who was selected from more than 2,000 applicants to have her family history researched and DNA tested alongside the series’ well-known guests.

“Through even greater depth of research and more powerful storytelling, all of the stories in AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES 2 share a common thread — they show the value of knowing who you are and where you come from,” added Gates. “And now, the inclusion of Kathleen’s story shows that viewers everywhere can take this same journey.”

Episode one, “The Road Home” (2/6, 9:00 p.m. ET), focuses on participants’ ancestors in the early 20th century. Stories include the tragic account of Tom Joyner’s great-uncles who, in 1915, were convicted by an all-white jury and executed in the electric chair for a crime that new evidence suggests they did not commit, and Bliss Broyard, who lived her life unaware that her father, renowned New York Times critic Anatole Broyard, was a light-skinned black man who chose to “pass” as white. She learned of her African-American roots upon her father’s death in 1990.

Episode two, “A Way Out of No Way” (2/6, 10:00 p.m. ET), continues tracing the guests’ lineages back through the late 1800s to the Civil War, featuring such stories as Chris Rock’s maternal great-great-grandfather, Julius Caesar Tingman, a black Civil War veteran who was twice elected to the South Carolina State Legislature; and Don Cheadle’s ancestors, who had been enslaved by Chickasaw Indians and brought to Oklahoma on the tail end of the “Trail of Tears,” the forced relocation of Native Americans during the 1830s.

Episode three, “We Come From People” (2/13, 9:00 p.m. ET), reveals stories of participants’ ancestors during the early years of the United States, such as a riveting account of life in slavery by Morgan Freeman’s great-grandmother, discovered within the records of the Depression-era Works Progress Administration, and Peter Gomes’ ancestors, who were freed and supported by Quaker families in Virginia in the late 1700s.

DNA analysis leads to fascinating discoveries about participants’ lineages in episode four, “The Past Is Another Country” (2/13, 10:00 p.m. ET). A groundbreaking study links Professor Gates to a powerful ancient Irish warlord, while evidence suggests Peter Gomes’ direct paternal line traces back to a Portuguese Jew who fled the country in the early 1500s to escape the Inquisition.

A book by Professor Gates, In Search of Our Roots: How 19 Extraordinary African Americans Reclaimed Their Past, will be published by Crown, a division of Random House, in spring 2008. Incorporating the family histories of all the participants from AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES, OPRAH’S ROOTS and AFRICAN AMERICAN LIVES 2, the book presents further discoveries not included in the broadcasts while weaving the narratives into an unprecedented tapestry of the African-American experience. In cooperation with seven public television stations across the country, a far-reaching educational outreach effort will guide K-through-12 teachers in the use of the broadcast program, Web site and educational print materials in standards-based classroom instruction.

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Comeback kids create chaos


By RON FOURNIER, Associated Press

WASHINGTON - In the land of comebacks, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and John McCain revived their sagging campaigns Tuesday night and catapulted the Democratic and Republican presidential races into a surprise state of chaos.

Neither could afford to lose New Hampshire. Suddenly, the fallen front-runners look like winners again.

Clinton defied campaign-closing polls and the expectations of her own advisers to pull out a narrow victory over Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the self-styled agent of change bidding to be the nation's first black president. She won with a last-minute show of emotion and pointed criticism of Obama, the harshest attacks coming from her husband, Bill.

In 1992, Bill Clinton dubbed himself "the Comeback Kid" after finishing a surprising second in New Hampshire.

McCain claimed the title Tuesday night after riding a wave of support from independent voters to defeat Mitt Romney.

"My friends, I'm past the age when I can claim the noun 'kid,' no matter what adjective proceeds it, but tonight we sure showed them what a comeback looks like," he told supporters as they shouted, "Mac is back!"

Celebrating her stunning upset, Clinton told supporters, "Let's give America the kind of comeback New Hampshire has just given me."

Clinton and McCain started out as presumptive favorites. Both lost their luster — Clinton with her crushing loss to Obama in Iowa last week and McCain with the near-collapse of his campaign last summer.

And now they're back, almost on top, in the wildest and most unpredictable presidential race of a lifetime.

Against predictions of a second straight defeat to Obama, Clinton won because:

• Women rallied to her side. She won the female vote by more than 10 percentage points, according to exit polls, after losing among women in Iowa.

• The youth vote did not lift Obama as it did in Iowa. He won 51 percent of votes cast by people under 30, compared with 57 percent in Iowa.

• Clinton somehow stalled Obama's momentum. Nearly four of every 10 voters selected a candidate in the last three days of the campaign, splitting their votes between Obama and Clinton.

Exit polls don't pinpoint why these three things happened, but there are several possibilities.

First, New Hampshire has a history of putting the brakes on surging candidacies, and the Clintons spoke to that sense of prudence by suggesting that Obama was not ready for the White House.

They urged New Hampshire to give the nation a chance to give Obama a second look.

"Some of us are ready," Hillary Clinton said on the eve of the primary, "and some of us are not." She even dusted off a line Walter Mondale used against Gary Hart 24 years ago: "Where's the beef?"

Second, the Clintons went negative on Obama's record to say he has not been consistent on a host of issues, including the Iraq war. Obama constantly trumpets his early opposition to the war without informing voters that, like Clinton, he later voted to pay for it.

"There's no difference in your voting record and Hillary's ever since," Bill Clinton said of Obama. "Give me a break! This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen."

Third, aides had urged her to show more passion and emotion, and, coincidentally or not, she did so by nearly breaking down during a restaurant appearance. Eyes welling up and voice quavering, she declared the campaign "is very personal for me. It's not just political."

But make no mistake: The moment was a political masterstroke. "I listened to you," Clinton told supporters Tuesday night, "and in the process I found my own voice."

Finally, Obama and fellow Democrat John Edwards joined forces in a Saturday debate to portray Clinton as a hostage of the status quo. They scored debate points, but Clinton may have won voters' sympathy.

She showed a soft and self-deprecating side known only to friends when asked what she could say to voters who don't find her likable enough. "Well, that hurts my feelings," she said with a flirty smile, "but I'll try to go on."

Thanks to New Hampshire, she and McCain can go on.

The Democratic race moves to Nevada and South Carolina, two states that looked solidly Obama until Tuesday night.

The Republican race moves to Michigan, where McCain is strong, and South Carolina, a hotbed of social conservatives that destroyed his campaign in 2000. Waiting for him will be the winner of the Iowa GOP caucuses, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

By keeping McCain and Clinton afloat, New Hampshire ensured that both races will continue at least until Feb. 5, when voters in two dozen states will get their chance to end the chaos.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE — Ron Fournier has covered politics for The Associated Press for nearly 20 years. On Deadline is an occasional column.

Monday, January 7, 2008

An emotional Clinton vows to fight on

By Ellen Wulfhorst

PORTSMOUTH, New Hampshire (Reuters) - A teary-eyed Hillary Clinton pushed for support on Monday as polls showed her poised for a huge New Hampshire loss to Democratic rival Barack Obama, but the former front-runner vowed to carry on with her presidential quest even if she loses.

Obama warned supporters against overconfidence as a flood of new polls gave him a double-digit lead over Clinton one day before the state casts the next votes in the race for the White House.

Polls will close in the state at 8 p.m. EST on Tuesday, with results expected to begin rolling in quickly.

At a campaign event in Portsmouth, Clinton choked up and grew uncharacteristically emotional when she talked about her reasons for seeking the presidency in the November election.

"Some of us put ourselves out there and do this," she said, her voice breaking and her eyes glistening with tears, "against some pretty difficult odds and we do it, each one of us, because we care about our country."

"But some of us are right and some of us are wrong," she said in a quaking voice. "Some of us are ready and some of us are not."

The incident resurrected memories of former Maine Sen. Edmund Muskie's tears during the 1972 New Hampshire campaign, credited with helping to bring down his front-running bid.

Clinton, who would be the first woman president, promised to stay in the fight until it was over, possibly on "Super Tuesday" on February 5, when 22 states hold nominating contests in the fight to be the party's nominee in November.

"Whatever happens tomorrow, we're going on," she told the CBS "Early Show."

"I've always felt that this is going to be a very tough, hard-fought election, and I'm ready for that," added Clinton, who finished third in the first contest in Iowa last week behind Obama and former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards.

Obama rolled across New Hampshire in an effort to turn out supporters, warning there was still plenty of work needed before Tuesday's vote.

"Do not take this race for granted. I know we had a nice boost over the last couple of days but elections are funny things," Obama, an Illinois senator vying to become the first black U.S. president, told supporters in Claremont.

In the state's hard-fought Republican race, Sen. John McCain of Arizona held a more narrow lead over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in new polls. He scrambled across the state to urge supporters to get out and vote -- and asked them to bring a friend.

'I'M GOING TO WIN'

"I need you to get out the vote tomorrow, this could be a very close election and it will depend on voter turnout," McCain said in Keene. "I'm proud to say I'm going to win tomorrow."

New Hampshire is the next battleground in the state-by-state process of picking Democratic and Republican candidates for November's presidential election to succeed President George W. Bush.

A Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll showed Obama with a 10-point edge on Clinton in the state, 39 percent to 29 percent, as he gained a wave of momentum from his win in Iowa.

McCain was relegated to the political scrap heap last summer after sinking polls and poor fundraising forced him to shake up his staff and recalibrate his campaign, but he now leads Romney by 5 points in New Hampshire.

Clinton and Romney are both under pressure to revive their campaigns after disappointing showings in Iowa, and a second consecutive loss for either could be devastating.

Romney, who at one time led polls in Iowa and New Hampshire, finished second in Iowa to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.

A wealthy former venture capitalist who has pumped tens of millions of his own money into the race, Romney said he was buoyed by a Sunday night debate where he tangled with McCain and Huckabee over their records on taxes and immigration.

"Right now it's a neck-and-neck race. But with the debate last night and the support I received from that debate I anticipate winning tomorrow," Romney said in Stratham.

Edwards, on a 36-hour campaign marathon around the state ahead of Tuesday's vote, did not respond directly when asked by reporters about Clinton emotional response.

"I don't have anything to say about that. I think what we need in a commander in chief is strength and resolve," Edwards said. "Presidential campaigns are tough business, but being president of the United States is also a very tough business."

The final day of campaigning in New Hampshire coincided with a bipartisan gathering of political moderates in Oklahoma attended by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, seen as a possible independent candidate for president.

But Bloomberg kept a low profile and repeated his frequent denials that he intended to be a candidate.

(Additional reporting by Steve Holland, Jeff Mason, Ed Stoddard, Jason Szep in New Hampshire; Jeff Franks in Oklahoma; Writing by John Whitesides; editing by David Wiessler)

Sunday, January 6, 2008

What to follow, the head or the heart?

Scot Lehigh | WEB EXCLUSIVE
January 6, 2008

New Hampshire was the place that Team Clinton hoped would sustain them even if they lost Iowa. Clinton has led here for months, has the support of many key players in the power structure, and benefits from a reservoir of good will for her husband.

Still, in the wake of Barack Obama's surprisingly strong victory in the Iowa caucuses, Clinton's advantage has crumbled -- and her campaign hasn't found an effective way to respond.

In Saturday night's debate, her attempts to draw a legitimate difference concerning the boldness of their respective healthcare plans misfired when Clinton overreached and tried to portray her chief rival as a man of many shifting positions. That brought a calm and dignified explanation from Obama, as well as a scolding from a forceful John Edwards, who styled himself as Obama's ally in pursuit of change -- and Clinton as the voice of the status quo.

All in all, it wasn't a night that helped her cause. With Obama outperforming her on the stump, she needed to demonstrate in no uncertain terms why she is the best choice for Democrats.

She didn't.

And that was probably her last best chance to reverse a tide of momentum flowing Obama's way.

Going negative on TV would have looked desperate -- and besides, with only five days separating Iowa and New Hampshire, there's simply no time for that kind of message to sink in.

Instead, the Clinton camp is stressing a two-pronged political argument.

Hillary and Bill are emphasizing that with the world situation dangerous and the national economy seemingly nosing toward recession, the country needs a candidate ready to be president from day one. The second part of their pitch: Given the ruthless efficiency of the Republican attack machine, the Democrats need a battle-tested candidate who is able to overcome anything that can be thrown at her.

That's an argument that says, vote your head and not your heart. It's one that voters here largely followed in 2004, with many switching from Dean to Kerry after the former's implosion in Iowa.

But this time around, it isn't working nearly as well with voters, and for good reasons: There are equally strong countervailing arguments.

Clinton is more experienced? Well, yes, but that doesn't mean she has better judgment. Witness Iraq.

Clinton is more battle-tested? Perhaps, but she is also more polarizing, which leads many to worry that she will never be able to persuade a majority to vote for her.

What's also clear is that in appraising Obama, voters aren't trying to decide if he has as much relevant experience as Clinton. Rather, they are judging whether he passes their minimum threshold for the presidency -- and increasingly they are concluding that he does, in no small part because of the serious, thoughtful way in which he conducts himself.

Clinton, meanwhile, lacks that excitement that's so important in the closing days of campaigns.

Clinton is treating the campaign as a job interview -- indeed, she called it exactly that in Penacook -- and trying to persuade voters that she has the best qualifications for the post.

Obama is treating it as a crusade -- and asking voters to join him in his quest for change.

Trust my experience and nominate me to make things better for you, she says.

Trust your heart and come with me and we'll change change our country together, he urges.

There's simply no comparison in the relative pull of those arguments.

Clinton's matter-of-fact approach had heads nodding in agreement and voters responding with occasional ovations on Saturday, as she answered questions for the better part of two hours, delving into the intricacies of policy in her effort to prove her readiness for the job. Still, though she was impressive in her knowledge, it was a bloodless performance, one devoid of the emotional energy that powers successful candidates in the final days.

Obama, by contrast, was far less specific about issues in his Friday speech to a large crowd at Concord High School.

But his soaring sense of shared cause, and his paean to hope and purpose, had the crowd cheering and clapping and stomping its feet in excitement.

She is playing precise but muted chamber music, something one listens appreciatively to.

He is offering Mozart's 39th, with uplifting crescendos that carry the audience away.

No one here will admit that they are influenced outright by Obama's Iowa victory, but a goodly portion of those I talked to were buzzing about the powerful speech he delivered after his caucus victory. For others, the Iowa victory has persuaded them that Obama could become a formidable general election candidate.

Bill Clinton made an effective appeal for his wife in Amherst on Saturday, and clearly scored points with a crowd of about 1,000. And yet, the former president is a double-edged sword. Even as he offers extravagant praise for his wife and her qualifications for the job, witnessing his witty and charismatic performance, one can't helped but be reminded yet again of just how plodding the candidate herself can be.

What to follow, the head or the heart?

Despite lingering nostalgia for the Clinton era, don't be surprised to see Granite State Democratic primary voters conclude that the time has come to embrace someone -- and something -- new and exciting.

Scot Lehigh's e-mail address is lehigh@globe.com

© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.
1 2 more stories like this