Sunday, January 27, 2008

Hamas: Attacks Will Stop When Palestinians Liberate “All of Palestine”


By Amihai Zippor

(IHC News Analysis, 24 January 2008)

Hamas Political chief Khaled Mashaal told a conference of opposition Palestinian groups in Damascus that his organization will never give up its fight against Israel.

“The struggle must continue until the entire siege on the Strip is lifted and until the liberation of Palestine – all of Palestine,” said Mashaal on Wednesday, 23 January 2008.

“We stopped the missiles before, as well as all types of resistance in a tactical manner, but this did not bring the siege to an end. Therefore, the missiles are not the reason, and the siege did not begin with the fuel and electricity crisis,” he said.

Mashaal’s defiant remarks came as visiting Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen met with Israeli President Shimon Peres in Jerusalem and demanded Hamas cease all terrorist activity.

“I condemn the firing of Qassam rockets on Sderot,” Ynetnews.com quoted Verhagen as saying after having toured the damage incurred by Israelis living in Gaza periphery communities.

“I visited the city and saw the people living in fear...No government can afford a situation in which its citizens are living under fire,” Verhagen said.

He added, a way must be found to show the Palestinians the alternatives “in order to stop them from leaning towards the extreme.”

Verhagen is one of the only international officials to openly vindicate Israel in the midst of the Gaza crisis.


-------------------------------------------------

Source: Original text contributed by the author, IHC reporter.

Copyright © Israel Hasbara Committee, 24 January 2008.

Permission is granted to use this material on condition the Israel Hasbara Committee is properly credited and that it is not for commercial purposes.

Anger over girls' strip searches ...

Katie and Gemma had all their own clothes taken away


Two British girls were sent to an orphanage for 30 hours and strip searched after their mother became ill during a holiday in the US.
Gemma Bray, 15, and her 13-year-old sister Katie also had their clothes taken off them and were asked if they had been abused or were suicidal.

Their mother Yvonne Bray of Appledore, Devon, says their human rights were infringed by the authorities.

She was hospitalised with pneumonia during a trip to New York.

The Administration for Children's Services in New York has declined to comment on the matter.


I'm not guilty of anything other than getting ill in a country without family or friends
Yvonne Bray

"What should have been the trip of a lifetime turned out to be a complete disaster from start to finish," Ms Bray told BBC News.

"I was going to give the girls money for their Christmas, but with the exchange rate being so good, I decided to book the trip to New York.

"This was their Christmas present and it was totally ruined."

The family flew out to New York on 27 December. When Ms Bray began coughing later that day, she initially put it down to her asthma and the air conditioning on the flight.

The following night, she became more unwell with laboured breathing and was admitted to the Queen's Medical Centre in Harlem.


But Ms Bray was told her daughters could not stay with her at the hospital as they were minors.

Yvonne Bray said she had now received a letter from social workers


"A doctor told me they would make the arrangements, then a few hours later a social worker arrived and said they'd try to find a foster family for the girls," she said.

"Instead of that they were taken to a orphanage and subjected to the kind of treatment you wouldn't even expect criminals to go through."

The frightened teenagers had their clothes, including their underwear, removed and were issued with a uniform of T-shirt and jeans before being spilt up and given a medical examination.

"Being away from Mum when you are alone in New York in an strange place with people you don't know - it's just scary," said Katie.


You didn't know how long you'd be there or if Mum would get better
Katie Bray

"At first it was so shocking - it was as if it wasn't happening but then it hits you.

"You didn't know how long you'd be there or if Mum would get better."

Photographs were taken and the girls were told they would not be allowed to visit their mother in hospital.

When the duty social worker told Ms Bray her daughters could not leave the orphanage, she discharged herself from the hospital against medical advice.

She said: "I was so cross. I didn't sign anything saying they could be examined or interrogated - they even asked them if they had been raped.

"They had to shower in front of strangers. What they went through would be a breach of anyone's human rights, let alone two girls on holiday."

'It's disgraceful'

Ms Bray has now received a letter from the Administration for Children's Services (ACS) to say she is now being investigated.

"It's disgraceful, but I'm trying to totally dismiss this," Ms Bray said.

"It seems like a standard letter because the children have been entered into the child care system.

"I'm not guilty of anything other than getting ill in a country without family or friends."

A spokeswoman from ACS told BBC News it was an "entirely confidential matter" and the department would not comment.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/england/devon/7206570.stm

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Attempts to eradicate the opium poppy fields in Afghanistan, A 'failure'





Mr Holbrooke describes Mr Bush's policy as ineffective

A former US ambassador to the United Nations has criticised President George Bush's attempts to eradicate the opium poppy fields in Afghanistan.
Richard Holbrooke has described the US policy as "spectacularly unsuccessful".

The administration is "wasting" around $1bn annually on a programme which actually encourages farmers to support the Taleban, he says.

According to the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, only 13 of Afghanistan's 34 provinces are "poppy free".

The problem is specially acute in the unstable south of the country.

'Ineffective'

Writing a column in The Washington Post newspaper, Mr Holbrooke says Mr Bush's vocal support in the last two years for aerial spraying of poppy fields highlighted what was wrong with the US policy.

Mr Bush's remarks "are part of the story behind the spectacularly unsuccessful US counter-narcotics program in Afghanistan", he says.


Mr Bush backed down from backing aerial spraying because the Afghan government and the international community argued it would "create a backlash against" Kabul and Washington.

"But even without aerial eradication, the programme, which costs $1bn a year, may be the single most ineffective programme in the history of American foreign policy," Mr Holbrooke writes.

"It's not just a waste of money. It actually strengthens the Taleban and al-Qaeda, as well as criminal elements within Afghanistan," he writes.

With the Taleban insurgency still raging, counter-narcotics teams in Afghanistan have been unable to make any impact on the poppy problem in the south.

Experts say stopping poppy production requires more than just laws.

The authorities have to also provide alternative livelihoods for the cultivators and build access to markets and education, among other things - things which are very difficult to deliver in an unstable environment.


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/7206205.stm

Published: 2008/01/24

American woman kidnapped in Afghanistan


AP Photo: Afghan policemen search a vehicle after an American aid worker was kidnapped in Kandahar, Afghanistan

By NOOR KHAN, Associated Press Writer
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - Gunmen kidnapped a burqa-clad American aid worker and her driver in southern Afghanistan's largest city early Saturday, snatching the woman from a residential neighborhood as she was on her way to work.

Cyd Mizell worked in Kandahar for the Asian Rural Life Development Foundation. Jeff Palmer, the aid group's international director, said the group had not been contacted by the kidnappers and that he did not know their identity or demands.

Asadullah Khalid, the provincial governor, blamed the kidnappings on the "enemy of Islam and the enemy of Afghanistan." Khalid said the 49-year-old American was wearing a burqa when she was taken.

Several foreigners — including 23 South Koreans, two German construction workers and two Italian journalists — have been kidnapped in Afghanistan in the last year, but kidnappings of Americans are rare.

A professor at Kandahar University, Mohammad Gul, said Mizell taught English language lessons at the university and embroidery lessons at a girl's school.

Gul said she speaks the local language, Pashtu, well and that if Afghans asked about her background she would say she was from the Alakozai tribe — a well known Pashtun tribe in the Kandahar region.

"She is a very patient and calm woman," Gul said. "She was always thinking about Afghanistan's future."

Palmer said she has worked for ARLDF on income-generating women's projects in Kandahar for the last three years.

"It is our hope that our worker will be released safely and quickly and we are doing all that we can to resolve the situation," Palmer said. "This is a first for our organization and we're really praying for a quick resolution."

Traveling around Kandahar city has turned increasingly dangerous in the last year, as the Taliban insurgency has spread throughout southern Afghanistan. Western civilians who operate there often travel with armed guards and with extreme caution. The area is rife with Taliban militants and also with criminals linked to the country's booming opium poppy trade.

A Taliban spokesman said he had no immediate information that the Islamic militia was behind the kidnappings.

In a likely plea to the woman's captors, Khalid noted that Mizell respected Afghan traditions by wearing the burqa and speaking the local languages. She did not travel with armed guards, he said.

Projects run by the Asian Rural Life Development Foundation are located around the city of Kandahar and include food for work, irrigation rehabilitation, health care and restoration projects, according to the group's Web site. The group also has projects in Vietnam, China, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka.

___

Associated Press writer Jason Straziuso contributed to this report from Kabul.

Rogue French trader taken into custody



Rogue trader Jerome Kerviel is
likely to face legal charges



By PIERRE-ANTOINE SOUCHARD, Associated Press

A rogue trader who cost France's Societe Generale bank more than $7 billion by making bad stock market bets was taken into custody on Saturday for questioning, judicial officials said.

Financial police in Paris were to question Jerome Kerviel as part of a probe into Societe Generale's announcement Thursday that the 31-year-old trader had put tens of billions of dollars at risk in one of history's biggest frauds, judicial officials said. They spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

Skeptics from Kerviel's neighbors to France's prime minister have questioned whether a single futures trader could have managed such large sums. Adding to the mystery, the bank said Kerviel may not have made any personal gain from his unauthorized trades.

The bank said it discovered the fraud last weekend and unwound the trader's losing bets starting Monday, when world markets tumbled. Some analysts have questioned whether Societe Generale exacerbated the fall and indirectly led to the U.S. Federal Reserve's subsequent decision to cut rates.

Judicial officials also confirmed police searched Kerviel's apartment in the Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine. They said police also went Friday night to the bank's headquarters, where they were provided with documents relating to the investigation, officials said.

Paris prosecutors are conducting a preliminary investigation based on three complaints: one by the bank accusing Kerviel of fraud, and two by small shareholders.

In an interview published Saturday, Societe Generale's chief executive, Daniel Bouton, insisted the bank's actions after discovering the fraud did not fuel turmoil on world markets.

"It's absurd!" Bouton said of the suggestion, in an interview with Le Figaro daily. "Anyone could calculate our contribution to the market in recent days."

Bouton was quoted as saying the bank, in closing the trader's unauthorized positions, respected market rules that forbid any player from intervening with sums worth more than 10 percent of a given market. The bank says that is why it took three days to close the positions.

The bank maintains it was the biggest loser in the case, because of the timing of the discovery.

Kerviel had been investing the bank's money by hedging on European equity market indices. That means he made bets on how the markets would perform at a future date.

Bouton said the trader had been betting throughout 2007 that markets would fall. "He was therefore winning, virtually," he said.

But the bank says he had overstepped his authority and was wagering more money than he should have.

So at the beginning of January, Bouton said, the trader voluntarily created losing positions, to neutralize his earlier gains and cover his tracks.

But markets dropped this month, and fast. "This sad affair veered into a Greek tragedy: His virtual losing position became huge," Bouton was quoted as saying.

The bank's systems discovered an anomaly on Jan. 18, he said. On Sunday, the full scale of the problem was revealed to the bank's management — "enormous and totally abnormal," Bouton said.

"I decided ... to close the positions and alert the supervisory authorities," he said.

When Asian and European markets collapsed Monday, "that had a catastrophic effect. The losses of Societe Generale became even more enormous," he was quoted as saying.

Ultimately it took three days to close the positions, and the bank lost $7.2 billion.

Bouton said the overall health of the bank was not at risk, comparing the situation to arson at a factory of a big manufacturer — a devastating, but one-time, loss.

French presidential aide Raymond Soubie said the trader had been dealing with more than $73.3 billion. That figure outstrips the bank's market capitalization of $52.6 billion, and is close to the annual GDP of entire nations such Slovakia, Qatar or Libya.

It remains unclear whether Kerviel's actions, if proved, were out of malevolence, ambition or some other reason. Three union officials representing Societe Generale employees said managers at the bank who briefed them about the fraud told them Kerviel was having family problems.

The debacle generated buzz at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and raised questions sector-wide about risk management.

French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde, speaking Saturday in Davos, said she has been asked to compile a report on the fraud, Dow Jones Newswires reported.

Lagarde said her report will look at "the reality of facts based on real hard data," and "how and why the controls did not work" to prevent the fraud. Lagarde said the report, whose results are to be made public, will address "what additional controls should be put in place to stop it happening again," Dow Jones said.

Societe Generale's shares have lost nearly half their value over the past six months. After an up-and-down day Friday, the shares closed down 2.5 percent at $108.62.

The company, which also posted another $2.99 billion subprime-related loss, planned to raise $8.02 billion in new capital.

___

Associated Press writers Cecile Roux and Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.

EU seeks to collect more data on foreign travellers

Agence France Presse.

EU ministers on Friday backed plans to collect data on air travellers coming to Europe, a move which could force visitors to provide information three times before entering.

The ministers, meeting in Brdo Pri Kranju, Slovenia, also discussed setting up a new exit-entry register on the European Union's outside borders to help stop foreigners over-staying their visas, the main cause of illegal immigration.

The EU hopes to have the so-called passenger name record (PNR) plan -- modelled along lines similar to the one agreed with the United States last year -- in operation early next year.

"PNR is necessary for an efficient fight against terrorism and organised crime," Slovenian Interior Minister Dragutin Mate said after chairing talks here with his EU counterparts.

The system would affect Europeans and foreigners when they enter the bloc, but it would provide a new layer of controls on non-Europeans, who would also give information via their visas and the planned entry-exit register.

EU Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini said the register was a must to stop cases like those in Italy involving Ukrainians who arrived on a tourist visa and then stayed and picked up black market jobs.

"One of the main problems we are facing is over-stayers. That cannot be tolerated," he said. "Over-stayers are the factor number one of illegal immigration."

He said the electronic register would collect biometric data including photographs and fingerprints.

The US PNR scheme picks up far more information.

European air travellers surrender 19 categories of data about themselves to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which it can keep for 15 years and share with law enforcement agencies.

The agreement, which collects data like credit card and passport details, e-mail addresses and travel itineraries, has raised privacy concerns in Europe.

It is unclear exactly how much information would be retained by the EU's 27 nations, or which authorities would have access to it, but some countries did express concern about the amount of data changing hands.

"I'm not sure that a huge flow of information could be examined in any useful way by all the member states," said Luxembourg Justice Minister Luc Frieden.

He urged EU members to study the effects of the US system before pressing ahead. "I would first like to have more information about the efficiency of the system that we have agreed with the United States," he told reporters.

Mate did not rule out launching a study into the US agreement while Europe moves ahead with its own plan.

"We can do this in parallel," he said.

EU anti-terrorism coordinator Gilles de Kerchove underlined that the "system in the European Union should not be inferior" to the one agreed with the United States.

Frattini, who has been a strong supporter of the plan, said tests conducted on a similar, national scheme in Britain had shown that it works well.

"No ministers raised doubts about the usefulness," he said.

He said Denmark and France were considering such a plan -- Spain has already made preparations on a PNR register of its own -- and warned of the dangers of having a patchwork across the EU.

"Suspect people entering the territory of a state where there is not a PNR system, will be free to move to another state," he said.

Friday, January 25, 2008

Canada Removes U.S. And Israel From Torture Watch List

The Canadian government has removed the United States and Israel from a watch list of countries where prisoners risk being tortured after coming under pressure from U.S. and Israeli officials. The Canadian Foreign Minister is now claiming that the United States and Israel were wrongly placed on a list that also included Syria, China, Iran and Afghanistan. The original document cited the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay and lists U.S. interrogation techniques including “forced nudity, isolation, and sleep deprivation.” Amnesty International Canada said it was disappointed by the Canadian government"s reversal. Amnesty’s Alex Neve said: “When it comes to an issue like torture, the government’s main concern should not be embarrassing allies.”

The Legacy of George W Bush's Presidency


THE LEGACY OF GEORGE W. BUSH’S PRESIDENCY

The Country He Inherited, The Country He Leaves Behind

THE ECONOMY
TODAY UNDER BUSH

REAL GDP GROWTH
4.09% Over Prior 8 Years
2.65% Over Prior 7 Years (Bush)

NATIONAL DEBT
$5.7 Trillion
$9.2 Trillion (Bush)

BUDGET DEFICIT/SURPLUS
$431 Billion Surplus / Previous Three Budget Years
$734 Billion Deficit / Previous Three Budget's Years(Bush)

NEW PRIVATE SECTOR
JOBS CREATED4
1.76 Million Jobs Per Year Over Previous 8 Years
369,000 Jobs Per Year Over Previous 7 Years (Bush)

AMERICANS IN POVERTY
31.6 Million
36.5 Million (Bush)

QUALITY OF LIFE
AMERICANS UNINSURED

CHANGE IN UNINSURED LEVEL
38 Million Uninsured
4.5 Million Less in 2 Years
47 Million Uninsured
8.5 Million More in 6 Years (Bush)

ANNUAL TOTAL PREMIUM COST
$6,230 for Family Premium
$12,106 for Family Premium (Bush)

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME &
CHANGE IN MEDIAN INCOME
$49,163 / $6,000 Increase in 8 Years
$48,023 / $1,100 Decrease in 6 Years (Bush)

PRICE OF GAS
$1.39/Gallon
$3.07/Gallon (Bush)

COST OF COLLEGE
$3,164 per year
$5,192 per year (Bush)

PERSONAL SAVINGS RATE
+2.3%
-0.5% (Bush)

CONSUMER CREDIT DEBT
$7.65 Trillion
$12.8 Trillion (Bush)

UNITED STATES & THE WORLD

U.S. TRADE DEFICIT
$380 Billion
$759 Billion (Bush)

STRENGTH OF U.S. DOLLAR

1.07 Euros per Dollar
0.68 Euros Per Dollar (Bush)

COMBAT READINESS

~ All Active Duty Army Divisions Were Rated
At The Highest Readiness Levels

~ Not A Single Active Duty Or Reserve Brigade In The U.S. Considered “Fully Combat Ready.” (Bush)

FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCY
52.75% of U.S. Liquid Fuel Consumption is Imported
60.38% of U.S. Liquid Fuel Consumption is Imported (Bush)

VIEW OF AMERICA ABROAD

PEW POLL OF TEN NATIONS
58.3% Viewed

America Favorably
39.2% Viewed (Bush)

GREAT BRITAIN’S VIEW OF U.S.
83% Favorable
56% Favorable (Bush)

INDONESIA’S VIEW OF U.S.
75% Favorable
30% Favorable (Bush)

TURKEY’S VIEW OF U.S.
52% Favorable
12% Favorable (Bush)

GERMANY’S VIEW OF U.S.
78% Favorable
37% Favorable (Bush)

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Tentative Deal Reached on Stimulus

*Jamie Rose for The New York Times
President George W. Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson answered questions on the proposed stimulus package.

By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN and DAVID STOUT
Published: January 24, 2008
WASHINGTON — House leaders and the White House on Thursday announced a tentative agreement on an economic stimulus package of roughly $150 billion that would pay stipends of $300 to $1,200 per household, and more for families with children, plus provide tax incentives for businesses to encourage spending.

The accord was announced by Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, and Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. at a Capitol news conference and hailed minutes afterward by President Bush as the fruit of “patience, determination and good will” in both parties.

The president and the speaker both described the accord as embracing the basic precepts of their respective parties. Mr. Bush called it “a powerful and effective way to help taxpayers and businesses” by letting people keep and spend more of their own money.

Ms. Pelosi said the package was aimed at the middle class “and to those who aspire to be in the middle class.” She described it as “timely, targeted and temporary — that was our standard.”

In addition to the tax rebates, or stipends, Ms. Pelosi said the package would offer some quick relief for those homeowners in danger of losing their houses.

Mr. Boehner called the package “simple, clean and neat.” Like Ms. Pelosi, he said none of the parties to the talks got everything they wanted. But in the end, he said, “This agreement is a big win for the American people.”

President Bush said the agreement was also a victory for the kind of bipartisanship that some politicians and political analysts say is in short supply in Washington of late. And as he has many times, the president said the American economy is “structurally sound” despite rising energy prices and problems in the housing industry.

Democrats released a summary estimating that the rebates would go to 117 million households. About two-thirds of the total package would go toward the rebates, with the remaining one-third going toward business tax breaks, like write-offs for equipment purchases.

Both leaders pledged quick action in the House, and both pointedly urged similar alacrity by the Senate, whose members operate “with their very senatorial rules,” as Ms. Pelosi put it.

“Speed is of the essence,” Mr. Paulson said.

President Bush underscored that message, as he offered warm praise for the negotiators in both parties. He also took the opportunity to urge once again the extension of tax cuts that were approved by the Republican-controlled Congress early in the decade and are to expire within a few years.

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic majority leader, said minutes after the announcement that he was pleased an agreement had been reached, and that he wanted a package ready for Mr. Bush by the time Congress recesses around President’s Day. But he said senators would “work to improve the House package” through the addition of unemployment benefits and other items.

Late in the negotiations that preceded Thursday’s breakthrough, Ms. Pelosi agreed not to include two proposals that have broad support among Congressional Democrats: an extension of unemployment benefits and a temporary increase in food stamps.

In exchange for those concessions, the Bush administration and House Republicans agreed that the stipend of at least $300 would be paid to all workers who earned at least $3,000 last year, even those who did not earn enough to pay taxes.

As it was presented on Thursday afternoon, the package calls for workers who paid income taxes to receive $300 to $600, and couples to receive up to $1,200 — plus $300 more for each child. The stipend, which some lawmakers were calling a “tax rebate,” would be subject to income limits so that the wealthiest taxpayers would not receive it. Payments would go to individuals with adjusted gross incomes under $75,000 and couples with adjusted gross incomes under $150,000. (Late Thursday afternoon, the White House corrected an earlier statement that the $75,000 and $150,000 ceilings applied to taxable incomes.)Senators Reid and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican minority leader, have yet to give their approval to the accord. But, while there may be some wrinkles to iron out between the House and Senate, there was nothing to suggest any disagreement so severe as to be a potential deal breaker.

Republicans immediately cheered the deal as “tilted toward taxpayers” and avoiding “extraneous spending” on unemployment benefits, food stamps, or infrastructure projects, which some Democrats had said should be included in a stimulus package.

But it was unclear how the package, without extended unemployment benefits or increased food stamps, would be received by Democrats in the Senate, including Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, who have said that those proposals offered the best prospects for quickly injecting added spending into the economy.

Senator Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat who is chairman of the Finance Committee, reiterated his interest in extending unemployment benefits at a hearing on Thursday morning, where he said his committee would mark up a fiscal stimulus bill next week.

“There are reports that a deal may be close on the House side,” Mr. Baucus said. “The Senate will want to speak, as well.”

That announcement of potential action by the Finance Committee could jar Democratic leaders who have been striving for a carefully coordinated effort on the economy. Earlier this week, Mr. Reid announced that the House would take the lead in developing the stimulus package and would conduct the immediate negotiations with the White House and Congressional Republicans.

Noting that tax rebates were one potentially cost-effective method to spur new spending, Mr. Baucus said: “Another example would be expanding unemployment insurance benefits. In recent recessions, Congress has extended the number of weeks that unemployed workers could receive benefits. We could do that again. We could provide a further extension for recipients in high unemployment states. And we could also temporarily increase the dollar amount of benefits to help unemployed workers to pay their bills.”

“Unfortunately, under current law, fewer than 4 in 10 unemployed workers receive unemployment insurance benefits,” Mr. Baucus continued. “To address this problem, we could extend eligibility. For example, we could extend benefits to part-time workers.”

Mr. Schumer, at the same committee hearing, also lamented Ms. Pelosi’s concession on unemployment benefits, but said he hoped that cooperation on a quick stimulus plan would continue. “While I may not agree with every element of the package — such as the decision to leave out extended unemployment benefits, which economists say would give us the greatest bang for the buck — there are some very positive developments around the tax rebate for families,” he said. “I encourage everyone to keep working in a bipartisan way.”

Ms. Pelosi met three times on Wednesday with Treasury Secretary Paulson and Mr. Boehner, who have served as chief architects of the plan in a rare show of bipartisanship.

On her way into a meeting Wednesday evening, Ms. Pelosi signaled that a deal might be close when she said there had been “tremendous” progress during the day.

Democratic leaders said that to speed the economic rescue package they would mostly bypass the usual committee process. Lawmakers said that they hoped the plan could be approved by mid-February and that it would be sufficient to soften an economic downturn and forestall a recession.

“One of the principal tenets of the administration and of ourselves is we have got to do this fast,” Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the majority leader, said Wednesday. “To go through the regular process and have hearings and have mark-ups and subcommittee mark-ups, obviously we would be to some degree twiddling our thumbs while the economy burns.”

The progress toward a stimulus plan came as the Congressional Budget Office revised its economic projections to give a gloomier assessment of the economy, including a widening budget deficit and the first decline in corporate tax revenue since 2003.

The grimmer outlook prompted Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee, to declare that a short-term stimulus package was insufficient.

“In addition to developing a bipartisan stimulus package,” Mr. Conrad said, “we also must work together to tackle the long-term fiscal challenges we face with the coming retirement of the baby boom generation. The American people rightly expect that we will come together to address these two significant challenges.”

House conservatives raised alarms about the emerging economic legislation, saying they feared it would focus too much on tax rebates and not enough on tax incentives to encourage businesses to create jobs.

They said any package should include provisions that would reduce the corporate tax rate, adjust capital gains for inflation and lower the capital gains rate for corporations.

“Giving temporary tax rebate checks to families, as important as that is, is not the same as economic growth,” said Representative Jeb Hensarling of Texas, chairman of the Republican Study Committee. “If you’re going to have an economic stimulus package, it ought to contain some economic stimulus.”

Steven Lee Myers contributed reporting.

~ Flash Back ~ Bill Clinton "America" willing To Role The Dice

By: Marc Ambender

It depends on what the American people think is more important....[do they] have somebody who is very his very nature a compelling, very attractive, highly intelligent, visible symbol of transformation, or is it more ...[important] to have someone who would also symbolize change...but who has done a significant number of things to change other people's lives."
*Bill Clinton to Charlie Rose 12.14.2007


14 Dec 2007

In a hard-changing interview with Charlie Rose tonight, Bill Clinton said Americans who are prepared to choose someone with less experience, are prepared to "roll the dice" about the future of America."It's less predictable, isn't it? When is the last time we elected a president based on one year of service before he's running?"

"What do you want to do -- whether you think it matters that, I mean, in theory, no experience matters," Clinton said. "In theory, we could find someone who is a gifted television commentators and let them run. They'd have only one year less experience in national politics..."

And Clinton said the notion that experience led the politicians to sanction the Iraq War is "absurd."

"That's like saying that because 100% of the malpractice cases are committed by doctors, the next time I need surgery, I'll get a chef or a plumber to do it."

Towards the end of the interview, Rose indicated that Clinton's staff was asking producers in his show's control room to get them to have Rose end the interview.

And Clinton said: "Somebody will parse this interview..." to take his quotes out of context. "It is stupid... I think we are fortunate in having people..I think the relevant question from me is, who will be the best president who has a proven record of making change in the lives of other people."

They may parse his body language. Toward the end of the interview, his hands began to shake and his face reddened as he discussed the political thicket his wife finds herself in.

Please read this rough transcription of Clinton's take on why his wife isn't doing well in Iowa and New Hampshire.


"Really, really interesting, that I've heard Sen. Obama a dozen times making some fairly derisive comment about Hillary...saying, you know, she had a decades old plan to be president...repeating this total canard that...totally fabricated account from an anti-Hillary book...as if it was something bad that he didn't have a decades-long president...so on their website they put reports that he had been planning to run for president...and they put this thing when he was in kindergarten that he planned to run for president..but the Obama people got the press on their side..."

Rose asked Clinton whether he was nervous about the state of the campaign.

"Well, no. Let me back up. In January, when on New Years Day, she said she was finally going to try and do this... I said I'll make you a prediction...allt he press will say you will coast to the nomination....I think you will have a difficult time getting nominated, and if you are nominated, you'll win the general election handily.....[HRC asked why]...you'll have to run in Iowa, which is the single most difficult state...but Sen. Edwards has a well-earned, huge cadre of support in Iowa because he's worked it for seven years...Sen. Obama is next door, that matters.

Rose: "You think that's the reason for the polls...""

Clinton: "On Edwards, there is no doubt...So, look I've done this before. When I lost in New Hampshire to Paul Tsongas, I lost the first 10 miles next to the Massachusetts border. I carried everything from 10 miles north up to the Canadian border. There are thousands of Illinois students in Iowa colleges...who have never caucused before...[insists he's not lowering expectations.]..he's been to 75 counties, she's been to 50..so my view of this is that I never thought she had a big lead in Iowa...the Iowa people have been really fair to her...they've listened to her and they've given her a chance, and she might win there...and it is astonishing...from the beginning of this race, she had a lead in 36 of 38 states...and not having good luck...what has really happened...what i have been frustrated about has nothing to do with her campaign...the challenges in the polls in the moments will be overcome..I can feel in Iowa, it depends on what people think the answer is...in New Hampshire...the Republicans have been attacking her in all the debates...those attacks affect independent voters...she is not in a position to answer back what the Republicans are doing in the primary...that has not been good..."

"In Iowa, nobody wants to go negative on television, so really it's a war underneath the radar screen and it has more to do with how the press interprets it than anything else...what broke her momentum there was the extraordinary attention given to her not very great answer on the driver's licenses....the press should have a common set of standards..."

"He is great, Edwards is really good..."

"It's a miracle she's got a chance to win."

Richardson, Biden, Dodd are ready to be president, Clinton says.

"Obama has got great skills. It depends on what the American people think is more important....[do they] have somebody who is very his very nature a compelling, very attractive, highly intelligent, visible symbol of transformation, or is it more ...[important] to have someone who would also symbolize change...but who has done a significant number of things to change other people's lives."

SEC probing Merrill on "front running":


Mon Jan 14, 2008 NEW YORK (Reuters) -
Reporting by Ritsuko Ando, editing by Will Waterman

Regulators are investigating whether several current and former employees at Merrill Lynch & Co Inc (MER.N: Quote, Profile, Research) improperly placed trades for the brokerage house's own account ahead of client orders, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

A Merrill Lynch representative was not immediately available for comment.

The report, quoting people familiar with the matter, said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission would look into whether some employees improperly stepped in front of orders placed by mutual fund operator Fidelity Investments to gain an unfair advantage.

The practice, called "front-running", takes advantage of the big stock moves that follow orders from big investment houses, such as Fidelity, to make a profit.

The period under scrutiny covers 2002 through 2005, the report said.

The SEC last year began investigating Merrill's subprime mortgage portfolio following the company's report of a $2.3 billion loss for the third quarter.

Reuters World News Highlights: 01.24.2008

JERUSALEM - Israel would like to sever its remaining connections with the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip after militants blasted open the territory's border with Egypt, a top Israeli defence official said on Thursday.
- - - -
MOSCOW - Russia's Central Election Commission said on Thursday it had grounds to disqualify former prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov from running as an independent in a March presidential election, news agencies reported.
- - - -
TEL AVIV - U.S. Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns said on Thursday a new draft resolution against Iran agreed by major powers would be punitive, despite remarks to the contrary by Russia's foreign minister.
- - - -
PARIS - European stocks surged in early trade on Thursday, tracking a Wall Street recovery on hopes that a rescue for troubled bond insurers could prevent more writedowns, while investors digested the announcement of a huge fraud at Societe Generale.
- - - -
JERUSALEM - Hamas has exposed Israel's inability to rein in the Gaza Strip, proving it holds the power to blow open the border and turn a crippling Israeli blockade into a public relations nightmare for the Jewish state.
- - - -
DAVOS, Switzerland - Climate campaigner Al Gore challenged policymakers on Thursday to step up action against the "planetary emergency" of global warming by making new laws, saying action by individuals could help only at the margins.
- - - -
BEIJING - China on Thursday defended its policies in Tibet and its relations with the government of Sudan, saying it was wrong for activists to seize on the issues as a way to pressure Beijing ahead of the Olympic Games in August.
- - - -
BAGHDAD - The police chief of the northern Iraqi city of Mosul was killed in a suicide bomb attack on Thursday as he toured the scene of a blast a day earlier in which at least 20 people died, police said.
- - - -
NAIROBI - Former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan met Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki on Thursday to try to end a crisis over the nation's disputed election, after having persuaded the opposition to call off street protests.
- - - -
SYDNEY - Australian actor Heath Ledger, who was found dead in his New York apartment, was edgy and anxious during his Christmas holidays about not seeing his daughter Matilda, close friend and model Sophie Ward told local media.

Tens of thousands of Palestinians flood into Egypt to buy supplies made scarce by an Israeli blockade


Mubarak tells Egyptian soldiers not to stop the human tide, Palestinians 'starving;'

MARK MACKINNON

RAFAH, EGYPT — Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians burst over the Egyptian border Wednesday for a chaotic but joyous shopping spree after masked gunmen broke Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip by destroying the rusty iron wall that marked Gaza's southern edge.

A series of predawn explosions destroyed most of the 11-kilometre-long barrier. Gaza residents and militants indicated that the barrier had been secretly cut weeks earlier so the detonations would bring it down. Crowds of Palestinians seized the opportunity to escape their isolation, flooding across to Egypt on foot and in taxis and donkey carts.

After months of deprivation, they bought everything and anything they could get their hands on and within hours store shelves on the Egyptian side of Rafah were almost completely cleared of goods. Palestinians with a bulldozer later cleared away some of the wreckage of the border wall, making it easier for cars to pass.

Israel worries that weapons could flow freely into Gaza, and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak had to tread carefully between his support for Fatah, and strong support in his country for the rival Hamas, which controls Gaza.

The opening of the border followed six days of escalating economic siege that saw Israel slash deliveries of fuel and other essentials to the Hamas-controlled strip. The blockade had left many of Gaza's 1.6 million residents with only occasional electricity, and caused shortages of food, medicines and other basic supplies.

For many Gazans, Wednesday was the first time in months they'd been able to buy household goods, such as dish and laundry soap. Goods had been prevented from entering Gaza by a partial blockade Israel imposed after Hamas seized control of the strip last June. The blockade was tightened last week in response to rocket fire targeting Israeli towns. Estimates of how many Palestinians crossed into Egypt Wednesday ranged from 200,000 to 500,000.

The influx continued Thursday morning, with thousands of Palestinians streaming into Egypt, where riot police began gathering at the border and directing traffic away from the downed wall.

Dozens of officers with search dogs used batons to beat the hoods of cars and pickup trucks that massed at the border to carry Palestinians further into Egyptian territory.

For some, it was the first time in their lives they'd been able to leave the crowded confines of Gaza, a tiny coastal territory that has been under some form of Israeli control for more than four decades.

“It's been very hard for us. There is no electricity in Gaza, the sewage is dangerous to your health, there's no flour and no bread,” said 23-year-old Nasreen Ayash, who crossed into Egypt with her husband Mohammed, 30, and their one-year-old son, Omar. They didn't have money to do much shopping, but wanted to see what life was like outside of Gaza for the first time in their lives. “Today is like a vacation for us. It's easier for us to go to [Sinai] than to go to the West Bank.”

Others came to replenish cupboards that were nearly bare. As Ms. Ayash spoke, masses of men, women and children surged jubilantly past, clutching bags of food, cartons of cigarettes and jugs of gasoline.

Others were more ambitious in their shopping, returning in vehicles laden with sheep, goats, refrigerators and motorcycles. Streetside money traders did a brisk business, buying Israeli shekels from Gazans and selling them the Egyptian pounds they'd need for their shopping trip.

Another popular item was cement, which Israel has barred from entering Gaza since Hamas took power last year. “I'm finally going to build my house!” shouted 29-year-old Radi Abu Salem as he drove a donkey cart stacked high with sacks marked “Egyptian Portland Cement” back into Gaza after an afternoon of shopping in Egypt. “I've been waiting six months to get cement.”

After years of boycotts and depression, Gaza's economy staged a mini-recovery in the first hours after the border opened. As long-missing goods reappeared on store shelves, prices fell sharply: The cost of a pack of cigarettes fell from 17 shekels (about $5) in the morning, to seven shekels by late afternoon. Prices on the Egyptian side, meanwhile, shot up as demand soon eclipsed supply.

Egyptian soldiers and riot police, who on Tuesday had repelled a Palestinian effort aimed at opening the Rafah crossing in a clash that injured dozens of people, stood amid the chaos, clutching wood batons and plastic shields but taking no action to stop the free-for-all. Realizing the military was standing aside, taxi drivers in Rafah began offering to drive Palestinians to other parts of Egypt.

Uniformed Hamas militiamen directed traffic returning to Gaza and occasionally stopped and searched cars in what Palestinian media reports said was an effort to prevent drug smuggling.

Citing the possibility that militants and weapons could now freely cross into Gaza, Israeli officials said the border breach was a “first-class security threat” and called on Egypt to take steps to restore order.

“Obviously, we are worried about the situation. It could potentially allow anybody to enter,” said Arye Mekel, a spokesman for Israel's Foreign Ministry.

But Mr. Mubarak, who before Wednesday had been accused of tacitly supporting the Israeli blockade by keeping the Rafah crossing closed, said he had ordered his soldiers not to stop the human tide because the Palestinians were “starving.”

“I told [the soldiers] to let them come in and eat and buy food and then return them later as long as they were not carrying weapons,” Mr. Mubarak told reporters in Cairo.

Israel, under international pressure, eased its blockade on Tuesday and allowed limited deliveries of fuel and other humanitarian goods. However, aid organizations said shipments of diesel fuel and other necessities were halted again Wednesday after Rafah was opened.

Any easing of the blockade is likely to stabilize Hamas's rule, something Egypt – which has allied itself with Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas and the rival Fatah party – is not eager to see. Due to an understanding between Israel and Egypt, the Rafah crossing has been largely closed since Hamas took power in Gaza.

However, a crackdown at Rafah could have serious domestic repercussions for Mr. Mubarak. Hamas is an offshoot to the Muslim Brotherhood, the most powerful opposition movement in Egypt. Several hundred Brotherhood activists were arrested Wednesday after taking part in pro-Hamas demonstrations in Cairo.

The city of Rafah has been divided into Palestinian and Egyptian sectors since 1967, when Israel seized Gaza after the Six-Day War.

The border was breached in 2005, after Israel's unilateral withdrawal of soldiers and settlers from Gaza. Order was restored three days later by Egyptian forces who sealed the hole with barbed wire. But damage to the border wall in 2005 was far less severe than that done by Wednesday's explosions, which left little of the barrier standing.

Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal said Wednesday that he was willing to work with the Egyptian government, as well as Mr. Abbas, to restore order at the border. His one condition was that Israel no longer have a say in when Rafah opens and closes.

~ Associated Press

Obama pushes back against the Clintons


By MURRAY CAMPBELL

Barack Obama hit back yesterday against his tag-team Clinton opponents in South Carolina's Democratic primary even as rival Hillary Clinton, trailing badly in a new poll, left the state.

Mr. Obama continued to counter the outspoken Bill Clinton, coming close to accusing the former president of lying. "The only thing I want to make sure of is that when he goes after me, that he goes after me on the basis of facts and policy differences and, you know, stuff isn't just made up," he said in a television interview. The comment showed that the Democratic race would likely continue to be bad tempered in the runup to Saturday's primary in South Carolina.

Bad blood between the Obama and Clinton campaigns spilled into the open at a Democratic debate on Monday when the two rivals traded accusations of dishonesty, policy reversals and campaign trickery.

John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, joined the fray yesterday by accusing Mr. Obama's opponents of resorting to smear tactics.

Mr. Kerry, whose presidential bid was wrecked by innuendo and lies about his Vietnam service, did not name the Clintons but they appeared to be the main target of his outburst. "The fight is just heating up. We won't let them steal this election with lies and distortions," he said.

The new poll, by Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby, gave Mr. Obama a double-digit lead over Ms. Clinton, with 43 per cent of Democratic voters, compared with 25 per cent for the New York senator.

John Edwards was a distant third with 15 per cent, despite being born in South Carolina. The majority of the polling in the three-day survey was done before Monday night's debate.

Mr. Obama, who was helped by a huge lead among the black voters expected to cast half the ballots in South Carolina, warned his supporters that good poll numbers are not enough.

"People can't take it for granted. Folks are saying, 'Well, Obama is leading in polls,' but that happened in New Hampshire, where people got complacent," he said in a radio interview.

Ms. Clinton said her team was fighting "a vigorous campaign" in South Carolina but she left her husband to speak on her behalf again yesterday as she travelled to Pennsylvania and New Jersey, which holds its primary on Feb. 5. Earlier this week, she made a 20-hour swing through California and Arizona, which are also holding primaries on so-called Super Tuesday.

Ms. Clinton is expected to return to South Carolina today but that didn't stop Mr. Edwards from criticizing her for leaving in the days before the primary.

The former vice-presidential nominee, who is emphasizing his South Carolina background, said voters should question whether Ms. Clinton would return if she became president. "After the debate, she flew out and won't be back," he said.

Republican hopefuls converged yesterday in Florida to proclaim their economic credentials before the state's primaries on Tuesday.

Former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has staked his candidacy largely on hopes of a good performance in Florida, said tax cuts and streamlined regulations are needed to fuel growth and ease fears that the United States is slipping into a recession.

Rival John McCain said that Florida needs to develop environmentally friendly "green technologies" and that lenders who caused the nation's mortgage crisis should be punished.

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney emphasized his experience in the private sector while linking a strong economy to security issues.

FBI denies file exposing nuclear secrets theft


From The Sunday Times(London)
January 20, 2008
Insight: Chris Gourlay, Jonathan Calvert and Joe Lauria


THE FBI has been accused of covering up a key case file detailing evidence against corrupt government officials and their dealings with a network stealing nuclear secrets.

The assertion follows allegations made in The Sunday Times two weeks ago by Sibel Edmonds, an FBI whistleblower, who worked on the agency’s investigation of the network.

Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency’s Washington field office.

She says the FBI was investigating a Turkish and Israeli-run network that paid high-ranking American officials to steal nuclear weapons secrets. These were then sold on the international black market to countries such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

One of the documents relating to the case was marked 203A-WF-210023. Last week, however, the FBI responded to a freedom of information request for a file of exactly the same number by claiming that it did not exist. But The Sunday Times has obtained a document signed by an FBI official showing the existence of the file.

Edmonds believes the crucial file is being deliberately covered up by the FBI because its contents are explosive. She accuses the agency of an “outright lie”.

“I can tell you that that file and the operations it refers to did exist from 1996 to February 2002. The file refers to the counterintelligence programme that the Department of Justice has declared to be a state secret to protect sensitive diplomatic relations,” she said.

The freedom of information request had not been initiated by Edmonds. It was made quite separately by an American human rights group called the Liberty Coalition, acting on a tip-off it received from an anonymous correspondent.

The letter says: “You may wish to request pertinent audio tapes and documents under FOIA from the Department of Justice, FBI-HQ and the FBI Washington field office.”

It then makes a series of allegations about the contents of the file – many of which corroborate the information that Edmonds later made public.

Edmonds had told this newspaper that members of the Turkish political and diplomatic community in the US had been actively acquiring nuclear secrets. They often acted as a conduit, she said, for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, because they attracted less suspicion.

She claimed corrupt government officials helped the network, and venues such as the American-Turkish Council (ATC) in Washington were used as drop-off points.

The anonymous letter names a high-level government official who was allegedly secretly recorded speaking to an official at the Turkish embassy between August and December 2001.

It claims the government official warned a Turkish member of the network that they should not deal with a company called Brewster Jennings because it was a CIA front company investigating the nuclear black market. The official’s warning came two years before Brewster Jennings was publicly outed when one of its staff, Valerie Plame, was revealed to be a CIA agent in a case that became a cause célèbre in the US.

The letter also makes reference to wiretaps of Turkish “targets” talking to ISI intelligence agents at the Pakistani embassy in Washington and recordings of “operatives” at the ATC.

Edmonds is the subject of a number of state secret gags preventing her from talking further about the investigation she witnessed.

“I cannot discuss the details considering the gag orders,” she said, “but I reported all these activities to the US Congress, the inspector general of the justice department and the 9/11 commission. I told them all about what was contained in this case file number, which the FBI is now denying exists.

“This gag was invoked not to protect sensitive diplomatic relations but criminal activities involving US officials who were endangering US national security.”

An FBI spokesman said he was not familiar with the case file but he added: "if the FBI says it doesn't exist, it doesn't exist."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3216737.ece

Bill expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama

DILLON, S.C. (AP) — Bill Clinton said Wednesday he expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama and women to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the dynamic may cause his wife to lose the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday. The comments by the former president — who also lashed out at Obama and the news media — mark one of the starkest commentaries yet on the possible role of race, although it has been a subtext of the Obama-Clinton rivalry for months. The comments also furthered the Clintons' bid to play down Sen. Clinton's chances of winning in a state where Obama seems to be ahead.

~Democratic Poll~

Barack Obama has a double-digit lead in the polls in South Carolina, where Democrats hold their primary Saturday.

Democrats

Obama: 43%

Clinton: 25%

Other: 17%

Edwards: 15%

SOURCE: ZOGBY INTERNATIONAL

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

West’s deadly nuclear secrets ... For sale:


Insight: Chris Gourlay, Jonathan Calvert and Joe Lauria
~ London Times Online ~

A WHISTLEBLOWER has made a series of extraordinary claims about how corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency’s Washington field office.

She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an Al-Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the 9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.

Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.

The name of the official – who has held a series of top government posts – is known to The Sunday Times. He strongly denies the claims.

However, Edmonds said: “He was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives.”

She claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior Pentagon officials – including household names – who were aiding foreign agents.

“If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials,” she said.

Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a joint Anglo-American intelligence effort. But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies such as the FBI and Britain’s Revenue & Customs have been aborted to preserve diplomatic relations.

Edmonds, a fluent speaker of Turkish and Farsi, was recruited by the FBI in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Her previous claims about incompetence inside the FBI have been well documented in America.

She has given evidence to closed sessions of Congress and the 9/11 commission, but many of the key points of her testimony have remained secret. She has now decided to divulge some of that information after becoming disillusioned with the US authorities’ failure to act.

One of Edmonds’s main roles in the FBI was to translate thousands of hours of conversations by Turkish diplomatic and political targets that had been covertly recorded by the agency.

A backlog of tapes had built up, dating back to 1997, which were needed for an FBI investigation into links between the Turks and Pakistani, Israeli and US targets. Before she left the FBI in 2002 she heard evidence that pointed to money laundering, drug imports and attempts to acquire nuclear and conventional weapons technology.

“What I found was damning,” she said. “While the FBI was investigating, several arms of the government were shielding what was going on.”

The Turks and Israelis had planted “moles” in military and academic institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. “The network appeared to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United States,” she said.

They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department official who provided some of their moles – mainly PhD students – with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear deterrent.

In one conversation Edmonds heard the official arranging to pick up a $15,000 cash bribe. The package was to be dropped off at an agreed location by someone in the Turkish diplomatic community who was working for the network.

The Turks, she says, often acted as a conduit for the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s spy agency, because they were less likely to attract suspicion. Venues such as the American Turkish Council in Washington were used to drop off the cash, which was picked up by the official.

Edmonds said: “I heard at least three transactions like this over a period of 2½ years. There are almost certainly more.”

The Pakistani operation was led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, then the ISI chief.

Intercepted communications showed Ahmad and his colleagues stationed in Washington were in constant contact with attach�s in the Turkish embassy.

Intelligence analysts say that members of the ISI were close to Al-Qaeda before and after 9/11. Indeed, Ahmad was accused of sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, immediately before the attacks.

The results of the espionage were almost certainly passed to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist.

Khan was close to Ahmad and the ISI. While running Pakistan’s nuclear programme, he became a millionaire by selling atomic secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. He also used a network of companies in America and Britain to obtain components for a nuclear programme.

Khan caused an alert among western intelligence agencies when his aides met Osama Bin Laden. “We were aware of contact between A Q Khan’s people and Al-Qaeda,” a former CIA officer said last week. “There was absolute panic when we initially discovered this, but it kind of panned out in the end.”

It is likely that the nuclear secrets stolen from the United States would have been sold to a number of rogue states by Khan.

Edmonds was later to see the scope of the Pakistani connections when it was revealed that one of her fellow translators at the FBI was the daughter of a Pakistani embassy official who worked for Ahmad. The translator was given top secret clearance despite protests from FBI investigators.

Edmonds says packages containing nuclear secrets were delivered by Turkish operatives, using their cover as members of the diplomatic and military community, to contacts at the Pakistani embassy in Washington.

Following 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for questioning by the FBI on suspicion that they knew about or somehow aided the attacks.

Edmonds said the State Department official once again proved useful. “A primary target would call the official and point to names on the list and say, ‘We need to get them out of the US because we can’t afford for them to spill the beans’,” she said. “The official said that he would ‘take care of it’.”

The four suspects on the list were released from interrogation and extradited.

Edmonds also claims that a number of senior officials in the Pentagon had helped Israeli and Turkish agents.

“The people provided lists of potential moles from Pentagon-related institutions who had access to databases concerning this information,” she said.

“The handlers, who were part of the diplomatic community, would then try to recruit those people to become moles for the network. The lists contained all their ‘hooking points’, which could be financial or sexual pressure points, their exact job in the Pentagon and what stuff they had access to.”

One of the Pentagon figures under investigation was Lawrence Franklin, a former Pentagon analyst, who was jailed in 2006 for passing US defence information to lobbyists and sharing classified information with an Israeli diplomat.

“He was one of the top people providing information and packages during 2000 and 2001,” she said.

Once acquired, the nuclear secrets could have gone anywhere. The FBI monitored Turkish diplomats who were selling copies of the information to the highest bidder.

Edmonds said: “Certain greedy Turkish operators would make copies of the material and look around for buyers. They had agents who would find potential buyers.”

In summer 2000, Edmonds says the FBI monitored one of the agents as he met two Saudi Arabian businessmen in Detroit to sell nuclear information that had been stolen from an air force base in Alabama. She overheard the agent saying: “We have a package and we’re going to sell it for $250,000.”

Edmonds’s employment with the FBI lasted for just six months. In March 2002 she was dismissed after accusing a colleague of covering up illicit activity involving Turkish nationals.

She has always claimed that she was victimised for being outspoken and was vindicated by an Office of the Inspector General review of her case three years later. It found that one of the contributory reasons for her sacking was that she had made valid complaints.

The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI’s methods and current investigations.

Her allegations were heard in a closed session of Congress, but no action has been taken and she continues to campaign for a public hearing.

She was able to discuss the case with The Sunday Times because, by the end of January 2002, the justice department had shut down the programme.

The senior official in the State Department no longer works there. Last week he denied all of Edmonds’s allegations: “If you are calling me to say somebody said that I took money, that’s outrageous . . . I do not have anything to say about such stupid ridiculous things as this.”

In researching this article, The Sunday Times has talked to two FBI officers (one serving, one former) and two former CIA sources who worked on nuclear proliferation. While none was aware of specific allegations against officials she names, they did provide overlapping corroboration of Edmonds’s story.

One of the CIA sources confirmed that the Turks had acquired nuclear secrets from the United States and shared the information with Pakistan and Israel. “We have no indication that Turkey has its own nuclear ambitions. But the Turks are traders. To my knowledge they became big players in the late 1990s,” the source said.

How Pakistan got the bomb, then sold it to the highest bidders

1965 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan’s foreign minister, says: “If India builds the bomb we will eat grass . . . but we will get one of our own”

1974 Nuclear programme becomes increased priority as India tests a nuclear device

1976 Abdul Qadeer Khan, a scientist, steals secrets from Dutch uranium plant. Made head of his nation’s nuclear programme by Bhutto, now prime minister

1976 onwards Clandestine network established to obtain materials and technology for uranium enrichment from the West

1985 Pakistan produces weapons-grade uranium for the first time

1989-91 Khan’s network sells Iran nuclear weapons information and technology

1991-97 Khan sells weapons technology to North Korea and Libya

1998 India tests nuclear bomb and Pakistan follows with a series of nuclear tests. Khan says: “I never had any doubts I was building a bomb. We had to do it”

2001 CIA chief George Tenet gathers officials for crisis summit on the proliferation of nuclear technology from Pakistan to other countries

2001 Weeks before 9/11, Khan’s aides meet Osama Bin Laden to discuss an Al-Qaeda nuclear device

2001 After 9/11 proliferation crisis becomes secondary as Pakistan is seen as important ally in war on terror

2003 Libya abandons nuclear weapons programme and admits acquiring components through Pakistani nuclear scientists

2004 Khan placed under house arrest and confesses to supplying Iran, Libya and North Korea with weapons technology. He is pardoned by President Pervez Musharraf

2006 North Korea tests a nuclear bomb

2007 Renewed fears that bomb may fall into hands of Islamic extremists as killing of Benazir Bhutto throws country into turmoil

Publish the secret document on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, ministers are told


Michael Crabtree~The Times(London)
The Foreign Office has been ordered to release a document written in 2002 by John Williams, then head of communications


Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Ministers were ordered yesterday to make public a secret document about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction that could shed light on the origins of the Government’s claim that Saddam Hussein needed just 45 minutes to launch non-conventional warheads at British troops.

The unpublished draft document was drawn up by John Williams, who in 2002, before the invasion of Iraq, was the head of information at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and one of the senior government spin-doctors.

Yesterday the Information Tribunal ruled that the Williams report should be made public so that people could make their own judgment as to whether its contents could have influenced the official dossier on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), including the 45-minute claim.

Although the Government, under Tony Blair, acknowledged that Mr Williams had written a draft report on Iraq’s WMDs, officials said that he had done so on his own initiative, and that it was dismissed.

Related Links
Blair: 'I believed in it then, I believe in it now'
The Government insisted that the official dossier on Iraq’s WMDs published in September 2002 was drawn up by the Joint Intelligence Committee, then headed by Sir John Scarlett, who is now the head of MI6, and that it was based on intelligence material.

Critics of the Iraq dossier, however, accused the Government of using Downing Street and Foreign Office spin-doctors to dramatise the contents to make the case for invading Iraq.

This has always been denied. But opponents of the war will want to see whether the 45-minute claim was included in the Williams draft.

The unprecedented ruling followed a request by the New Statesman under the Freedom of Information Act for the Williams dossier to be made public.

Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, ruled in favour of the magazine in May last year, but the Foreign Office appealed to the tribunal.

Last night the Foreign Office said that the tribunal ruling was being studied closely.

Sources at the Foreign Office said that a minister had to give authorisation for the release of the document, and would still be in a position to claim that publication would not be in the national interest.

Lawyers for the Foreign Office told the tribunal that disclosure of the contents written by Mr Williams, who no longer works for the Foreign Office, would compromise the confidentiality of advice given to ministers — known in Whitehall as “the chilling effect”.

However, the tribunal concluded that the chilling effect would have been quite limited because of the huge amount of material about Iraq’s WMDs that had been put into the public domain by Lord Hutton. He was the former judge who chaired the inquiry into the circumstances leading to the suicide of David Kelly, the Ministry of Defence Iraq weapons expert.

Lord Hutton did not believe that the Williams draft formed a part of the process that led to the dossier on Iraq’s WMDs.

However, the tribunal raised questions about the Hutton inquiry and concluded: “We do not accept that we should, in effect, treat the Hutton report as the final word on the subject.

“Information has been placed before us which was not before Lord Hutton which may lead to questions as to whether the Williams draft in fact played a greater part in influencing the drafting of the \ dossier than has previously been supposed,” the tribunal said.

“We make no comment on whether it did so in fact. But we believe that the existence of those possible questions is a relevant factor in evaluating the public interest in disclosure.”

John Baron, the Conservative MP for Billericay, told the New Statesman: “This decision lifts the lid on government efforts to cover up the role played by spin-doctors in producing the Iraq dossier.”

The Foreign Office lawyers argued that, as the Hutton report was issued at the end of a detailed investigation into the drafting process, the public interest had been served.

The tribunal added: “We were also also invited to conclude that the disclosure of an early draft, developed by someone who was not an intelligence specialist and who was operating on his own initiative, might in fact mislead the public into believing that it represented government views which counsel for the [Foreign Office] said it did not.”

In his evidence to the Hutton inquiry, Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair’s director of communications, said that all papers and drafts on Iraq in existence before September 9, 2002, became “redundant”, and from that date, Sir John would “take all of this information, all of this material, and turn it into a new dossier”.

Obesity surgery seen as diabetes cure



By CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press
CHICAGO - A new study gives the strongest evidence yet that obesity surgery can cure diabetes.

Patients who had surgery to reduce the size of their stomachs were five times more likely to see their diabetes disappear over the next two years than were patients who had standard diabetes care, according to Australian researchers.

Most of the surgery patients were able to stop taking diabetes drugs and achieve normal blood tests.

"It's the best therapy for diabetes that we have today, and it's very low risk," said the study's lead author, Dr. John Dixon of Monash University Medical School in Melbourne, Australia.

The patients had stomach band surgery, a procedure more common in Australia than in the United States, where gastric bypass surgery, or stomach stapling, predominates.

Gastric bypass is even more effective against diabetes, achieving remission in a matter of days or a month, said Dr. David Cummings, who wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal but was not involved in the study.

"We have traditionally considered diabetes to be a chronic, progressive disease," said Cummings of the University of Washington in Seattle. "But these operations really do represent a realistic hope for curing most patients."

Diabetes experts who read the study said surgery should be considered for some obese patients, but more research is needed to see how long results last and which patients benefit most. Surgery risks should be weighed against diabetes drug side effects and the long-term risks of diabetes itself, they said.

Experts generally agree that weight-loss surgery would never be appropriate for diabetics who are not obese, and current federal guidelines restrict the surgery to obese people.

The diabetes benefits of weight-loss surgery were known, but the Australian study in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association is the first of its kind to compare diabetes in patients randomly assigned to surgery or standard care. Scientists consider randomized studies to yield the highest-quality evidence.

The study involved 55 patients, so experts will be looking for results of larger experiments under way.

"Few studies really qualify as being a landmark study. This one is," said Dr. Philip Schauer, who was not involved in the Australian research but leads a Cleveland Clinic study that is recruiting 150 obese people with diabetes to compare two types of surgery and standard medical care.

"This opens an entirely new way of thinking about diabetes."

Obesity is a major risk factor for diabetes, and researchers are furiously pursuing reasons for the link as rates for both climb. What's known is that excess fat can cause the body's normal response to insulin to go haywire. Researchers are investigating insulin-regulating hormones released by fat and the role of fatty acids in the blood.

In the Australian study, all the patients were obese and had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes during the past two years. Their average age was 47. Half the patients underwent a type of surgery called laparoscopic gastric banding, where an adjustable silicone cuff is installed around the upper stomach, limiting how much a person can eat.

Both groups lost weight over two years; the surgery patients lost 46 pounds on average, while the standard-care patients lost an average of 3 pounds.

Blood tests showed diabetes remission in 22 of the 29 surgery patients after two years. In the standard-care group, only four of the 26 patients achieved that goal. The patients who lost the most weight were the most likely to eliminate their diabetes.

Both patient groups learned about low-fat, high-fiber diets and were encouraged to exercise. Both groups could meet with a health professional every six weeks for two years.

The death rate for stomach band surgery, which can cost $17,000 to $20,000, is about 1 in 1,000. There were only minor complications in the study. Stomach stapling has a 2 percent death rate and costs $20,000 to $30,000.

In the United States, surgeons perform more than 100,000 obesity surgeries each year.

The American Diabetes Association is interested in the findings. The group revises its recommendations each fall, taking new research into account.

"There is a growing body of evidence that bariatric surgery is an effective tool for managing diabetes," said Dr. John Buse of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Chapel Hill, the association's president for medicine and science.

"It's just a question of how effective is it, for what spectrum of patients, over what period of time and at what cost? Not all those questions have been answered yet."

Medical devices used in the study were provided by the manufacturers, but the companies had no say over the study's design or its findings, Dixon said.

___

On the Net:

JAMA: http://jama.ama-assn.org

Text of Bush's comments on economy


By The Associated Press

~Text~ of President Bush's comments Friday on his economic stimulus plan, as transcribed by CQ Transcriptions.

BUSH: Over the past several months, I've held a series of meetings with my economic team on the outlook for the U.S. economy. And before I left for the Middle East, I directed them to conduct a thorough assessment of our economic condition, consult with members of Congress, and provide me with their recommendations about any actions we might need to take.

The economic team reports that our economy has a solid foundation, but that there are areas of real concern.

The economy's still creating jobs, though at a reduced pace. Consumer spending is still growing, but the housing market is declining. Business investment and exports are still rising, but the cost of imported oil has increased.

My administration has been watching our economy carefully. My advisers and many outside experts expect that our economy will continue to grow over the coming year, but at a slower rate than we have enjoyed for the past few years. And there is a risk of a downturn.

Continued instability in the housing and financial markets could cause additional harm to our overall economy and put our growth and job creation in jeopardy.

In recent months we've taken steps to shore up the housing market, including measures to help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure and to keep their homes. I also have asked Congress to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration and enable it to provide additional assistance to struggling homeowners.

The House passed a bill and the Senate passed a bill, and now they need to get together and get a bill to my desk as quickly as possible.

After careful consideration, and after discussion with members of the Congress, I've concluded that additional action is needed. To keep our economy growing and creating jobs, Congress and the administration need to work to enact an economic growth package as soon as possible.

As Congress considers such a plan, there are certain principles that must guide its deliberations.

This growth package must be big enough to make a difference in an economy as large and dynamic as ours, which means it should be about 1 percent of GDP. This growth package must be built on broad-based tax relief that will directly affect economic growth, and not the kind of spending projects that would have little immediate impact on our economy.

This growth package must be temporary and take effect right away so we can get help to our economy when it needs it most.

And this growth package must not include any tax increases.

Specifically, this growth package should bolster both business investment and consumer spending, which are critical to economic growth. And this would require two key provisions.

To be effective, a growth package must include tax incentive for American businesses, including small businesses, to make major investments in their enterprises this year.

Giving them an incentive to invest now will encourage business owners to expand their operations, create new jobs and inject new energy into our economy in the process. To be effective, a growth package must also include direct and rapid income tax relief for the American people. Americans could use this money as they see fit: to help meet their monthly bills, cover higher costs at the gas pump, or pay for other basic necessities.

Letting Americans keep more of their own money should increase consumer spending and lift our economy at a time when people otherwise might spend less.

Yesterday I spoke to members of the congressional leadership from both political parties. They shared with me their thoughts on the best way forward. And I was encouraged by those discussions, and I believe there is enough broad consensus that we can come up with a package that can be approved with bipartisan support.

I've asked Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to lead my administration's efforts to forge an agreement with Congress so that we can deliver this needed boost to our economy as quickly as possible.

Passing a new growth package is our most pressing economic priority. When that is done, Congress must turn to the most important economic priority for our country, and that's making sure the tax relief that is now in place is not taken away.

A source of uncertainty in our economy is that this tax relief is set to expire at the end of 2010. Unless Congress acts, the American people will face massive tax increases in less than three years. The marriage penalty will make a comeback, the child tax credit will be cut in half, the death tax will come back to life, and tax rates will go up on regular income, capital gains and dividends.

This tax increase would put jobs and economic growth at risk, and Congress has the responsibility to keep that from happening. So it's critical that Congress make this tax relief permanent.

We're in the midst of a challenging period, and I know that Americans are concerned about their economic future. But our economy has seen challenging times before, and it is resilient.

In a vibrant economy, markets rise and decline. We cannot change that fundamental dynamic. As a matter of fact, eliminating risk altogether would also eliminate the innovation and productivity that drives the creations of jobs and wealth in America.

Yet there are also times when swift and temporary actions can help ensure that inevitable market adjustments do not undermine the health of the broader economy. This is such a moment.

By passing an effective growth package quickly, we can provide a shot in the arm to keep a fundamentally strong economy healthy. And it will help keep economic sectors that are going through adjustments, such as the housing market, from adversely affecting other parts of our economy.

I'm optimistic about our economic future, because Americans have shown time and again that they are the most industrious, creative and enterprising people in the world. That's what has made our economy strong. And that is what will make it stronger in the challenging times ahead.

Thank you.